As the IT environment becomes more complicated, IT professionals face unprecedented pressure to provide critical data for business. With the help of hybrid work, the new standard and cloud reception, the data are increasingly distributed in different conditions, providers and places, expanding the surface of the attack for new cyber -translations. Although the need for a strong data protection strategy has become more critical than when, organizations get into a tough balancing act. They are struggling to manage the growth and complexity of business continuity and resumption of the consequences of the disaster (BCDR), while providing that their important business data remain safe and restored.
To help IT commander and managed service providers (MSPS) understand how their peers are moving on these issues, a backup and recovery report has collected an understanding of more than 3000 IT specialists, security experts and administrators worldwide. The report shows how businesses solve the biggest data protection issues, strategies they take, and critical gaps that can leave them vulnerable to data loss and downtime.
So, where are the organizations standing? The poll shows that the confidence in the reserve systems is reduced, the adoption of the cloud is superior to data protection strategies, and recovery expectations are often untrue. In this article, we will look at the key conclusions from the report to help IT -commander and MSPS remain prepared for what’s next. Meanwhile, for full understanding and effective strategies, You can upload the full report now And look how your organization compares.
Paradox Backup: Substantial but increasingly unreliable
Backup and recovering data should be a security network for business, but for many it has become a source of disappointment, difficulty and risk. The numbers tell about a clear history – the ineffectiveness of the backup is growing, the IT commander is overloaded, and safety vulnerabilities remain widespread. Let’s plunge into key conclusions.
Tree # 1: Data loss is no longer a matter of “if” but “if”.
In 10 out of 10 organizations over the past 12 months have survived the time of operational downtime.
Tree # 2: Confidence in reserve systems is reduced.
Trusting the backup solutions slides, leaving many businesses that question whether they can reliably recover from the data loss.
- Only 40% IT -Command feel confident in its backup systems.
- About 30% are worried that their backup strategy is insufficientcausing concern in data safety and recovery.
- More than half of the organizations plan to switch backup providersReferring to the cost, ineffectiveness and limited possibilities of restoring disasters as major pain points.
Tree # 3: Reserve Management is a time-consuming load.
Control of backups is not just difficult – it drains IT resources. As the volumes of data grow, the IT -coomeda spend more time than if -no, supporting the backup systems, testing the processes of recovery and troubleshooting.
- Now they teams spend 10+ hours per week Control of backups, adding to operational voltage.
- The number of enterprises Spending more than three hours a week on backup jumped from 5% in 2022 to 23% in 2024designation of considerable growth of time and effort.
- About 35% of organizations wouldn’t even know if they missed backups or missedhighlighting critical gaps in monitoring and testing.
Tree # 4: Safe gaps leave backups.
The backup systems should be the last line of cyber -broadcast protection. However, many contain serious disadvantages that expose data.
- About 25% of work loads lack policies that limit unauthorized access to backupsleaving them vulnerable to malicious attacks.
- There are different levels of protection of accounts in different enterprises. Only 33% of businesses use special password managers. Others rely on less safe methods such as storage platforms or password -based instruments, introducing potential vulnerabilities.
Recovery gap: Why businesses can’t bounce fast enough
The presence of the data backup is one; Its healing quickly and reliably is another. IT COMMANDS face significant obstacles in providing rapid and unobstructed recovery when the catastrophe is coming.
Tree # 1: Quick and reliable data recovery remains the main problem in data protection.
The main problems associated with IT cameras on data protection are costs, requirements for requirements and the actual data recovery process. Since IT is spending hours, managing and troubleshooting, it leaves little time to check and check the recovery processes, increasing the risk of refusal when it is most important.
Trend # 2: Backups and doctors of testing leave the enterprises vulnerable.
The backup decision is only the same as its ability to restore data, but the testing remains controversial for organizations.
- Only 15% of businesses conduct daily backup testsThat is, most work with a risk level that may endanger the crisis recovery.
- Testing the restoration of natural disasters (DR) goes beyond simple checking checks – this involves evaluation of recovery, terms and efficiency. While About 20% of businesses conduct DR tests weekly and another 23% of the test monthThe rest are either checking irregularly or not at all, leaving them unprepared to restore the real world.
Treaty # 3: Most enterprises are reassemerable for recovery.
The lack of frequent testing is detected when looking at the real recovery time.
- While close to 60% of businesses believe that they can recover a day, only 35% in fact.
- Anxious, more than 10% of businesses do not even know how much time it will take to restore their Saas business dataIf they could return it at all.
- Among the enterprises that use Public cloud services such as Azure, nearly 90% count on native data protection tools, but more than 60% do not have valid DR opportunities.
Cloudy dilemma: covers growth without sacrificing protection
Now the cloud is the basis of modern IT, which nourishes everything from infrastructure to cooperation. Businesses quickly make Cloud and Saas decisions to increase flexibility and scalability, but many do not notice a critical factor: data protection.
Treaty # 1: Adoption of the cloud continues to grow.
The transition to the cloud load is only increased, due to the need for agility and stability.
- The cloud is now located more than 50% of workloadsWith this number Expected that within two years reach 61%.
Most organizations now use hybrid and perennial strategies to increase flexibility and avoid dependence on one vendor. However, the Saas cloud gaps remain, subject to critical business information information. In particular, the SAAS platforms now serve as the basis of daily businesses, but without the right backup strategies, this data remains vulnerable.
Tree # 2: Small and Medium Business (SMB) prefer Google Workspace, while businesses prefer Microsoft 365.
- Microsoft 365 dominates the market with more than 50% organization Based on it for cooperation and performance.
- Google Workspace (35%) The main choice remains, especially among SMB.
- Microsoft 365 Entra ID (31%) and speaker (30%) Show that businesses are also increasingly taking specialized Microsoft products.
- Salesforce (25%) The final top five.
Treaty # 3: Cost, load compatibility, suppliers’ lock and security problems-large barriers for cloud migration.
While the cloud adoption continues to accelerate, businesses still face serious obstacles in providing a win -win transition and providing them with data.
Lessons: What IT Liders should prefer now
The backup and recovery report and the recovery of 2025 shows that critical gaps are safe when providing local, cloud, final points and SAAS. There is a growing gap between reserve investments and actual re -confidence, and IT -co -nationals are not sure whether they can restore data when it is most important. Without a more supple approach to data protection, businesses risk continuing downtime, sharp financial losses and irreversible data violations.
Did you consider how much shutdown can cost your organization per minute? According to ITThe average cost of unplanned downtime is $ 14,056 per minute for the organization.
Let’s carefully look at the cost of downtime in different sizes of business.
The continuity of the business depends on faster and more elastic recovery. However, many organizations are not as ready as they think. To minimize downtime and financial losses, IT Liders must review their approach to BCDR. BCDR’s current strategy goes beyond a basic backup, including multi -layered security, automation and hybrid cloud solutions to strengthen the stability and ensure business continuity against today’s complex cyber -exhistresses.
The protection is not enough. Without regular trials, the organization leave to guess whether their plans for recovery in the real crisis will be. A more frequent backup testing and recovery guarantees that the recovery goals will be fulfilled if it is most important. Automation plays a key role there. Testing automation, IT Cams can constantly check their ability to restore data in the required time – everything without disturbing the production environment. This removes the manual load and gives a real idea of the recovery readiness.
At the same time, stronger safety control is also important for protecting the reserve environments from unauthorized access. Almost In 94% of the victims of the ransom there are targeted for backups attackers that leaves no other choice but pay ransom to return your access. On this front, improvement in accounts and tougher access control can help prevent access to malicious subjects from reserve infrastructure.
Final Thoughts: Future BCDR begins now
IT -Lands changes, and at the same time the risks are increasing. As the enterprises move on to the cloud and more count on SAAS applications, their backup strategies and the accident should develop just as quickly. Cyber -story is more advanced, downtime is more expensive, and organizations can no longer afford to consider a backup as a idea. In order to keep up with this new reality, businesses must revise their approach and strengthen protection against growing threats that can stop operations.
For IT MSPS and MSPS, understanding of the backup and recovery of 2025 provides a precise road map to assess vulnerabilities and improve resistance to crash strike. Download full report now To focus on your strategy, reveal critical gaps and build a stronger, reliable BCDR plan for the future.
